Decoding Robots.txt for Proxy-Enabled Web Scraping

Nathan Reynolds

Last edited on May 8, 2025
Last edited on May 8, 2025

Scraping Techniques

Understanding Robots.txt: A Guide for Web Scrapers Using Proxies

Ever stumbled upon a `robots.txt` file? It's a simple text document found on most websites. You can usually view it by appending `/robots.txt` to a site's main URL (like http://yourwebsite.com/robots.txt).

Despite its simplicity, `robots.txt` plays a crucial role in the world of automated web interactions, including crawling and scraping. Originally designed for search engine bots, its guidelines now extend to virtually all forms of web automation.

What Exactly is Robots.txt?

At its core, the `robots.txt` file contains instructions for bots and automated scripts visiting a website. Typically, it specifies which sections of the site bots should avoid accessing. It often includes a `User-agent` identifier, indicating which specific bots (like search engine crawlers) the rules apply to.

The file follows specific formatting conventions. For instance, to block all bots from accessing a directory named `/confidential/`, the file might look like this:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

However, website owners can create more nuanced rules. They might allow a specific bot access while restricting others:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
# Allow access only to this page within the restricted directory
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

In this scenario, all bots except `SpecificBot` are barred from the `/confidential/` directory, but `SpecificBot` is permitted to visit `/confidential/public-info.html`.

It's vital to remember that `robots.txt` is a directive, not a security measure. Bots *can* technically ignore these instructions and access any publicly available page. However, disregarding `robots.txt` is widely considered bad practice, and reputable organizations generally adhere to its rules.

Furthermore, even if a section is disallowed, bots might inadvertently land there if an internal link points to it from an allowed page. Crawlers often follow links they discover.

Consequently, `robots.txt` serves both web crawlers and Search Engine Optimization (SEO). It guides crawlers on permissible paths and tells search engines which pages should (or shouldn't) be indexed for search results.

The Anatomy of a Robots.txt File

As noted, `robots.txt` relies on a specific syntax for clarity and effectiveness. The key components include:

  • User-agent Directive: Specifies the bot(s) to which the subsequent rules apply.

  • Allow/Disallow Rules: Defines access permissions for specific directories or pages for the designated user agent.

  • Special Characters: While not full regex support, `robots.txt` uses characters like the asterisk (*) as a wildcard (matching any character sequence) and the dollar sign ($) to denote the end of a URL path.

Let's revisit a previous example structure:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

User-agent lines always initiate a rule block. In the first block, the wildcard * means the `Disallow: /confidential/` rule applies to *all* user agents. The second block creates an exception specifically for `SpecificBot`.

Disallowing certain areas helps manage how search engines crawl a site. Most search engines allocate a "crawl budget"—a limit on how many URLs they will crawl on a site during a visit. Blocking unimportant or redundant sections ensures the crawler focuses its budget on valuable content, which is crucial for SEO on large websites.

The dollar sign ($) offers finer control, often used to target specific file types or URL patterns. While less common, it can be very useful:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*.pdf$

This rule instructs all bots not to crawl any URL ending specifically with `.pdf`. Another practical use is preventing the crawling of URLs with tracking parameters, which can lead to duplicate content issues:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*?ref=

Here, any URL containing the query parameter `ref=` (often used for referral tracking) is disallowed for all bots.

How to Interpret a Robots.txt File: A Quick Guide

On nearly every domain, the `robots.txt` file resides in the main directory and is accessible by adding `/robots.txt` to the base URL (e.g., http://example.com/robots.txt).

Since it's plain text, fetching its contents programmatically is straightforward. Using Python with the `requests` library is a popular method:

import requests

target_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

try:
    response = requests.get(target_url)
    response.raise_for_status() # Check if the request was successful
    print(response.text)
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Error fetching robots.txt: {e}")

This code snippet prints the content of the `robots.txt` file. For web scraping projects involving multiple sites, you'll likely want to fetch and store these files locally for efficient checking:

import requests
import os

# URL for the robots.txt file
robots_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

# Define filename based on domain or other convention
file_name = "example_com_robots.txt"

try:
    # Fetch the content
    response = requests.get(robots_url)
    response.raise_for_status()  # Ensure request was successful

    # Save the content locally
    with open(file_name, "w", encoding='utf-8') as f:
        f.write(response.text)

    print(f"{file_name} downloaded successfully.")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Failed to download {robots_url}: {e}")

This saves the file, allowing offline access. Adopting a consistent naming convention is advisable when dealing with numerous `robots.txt` files.

For website owners, tools like Google Search Console offer a validator (Robots.txt Tester) to check if your file is correctly structured and interpreted by Google.

Ethical Web Scraping: Working with Robots.txt

Major search engines rigorously follow `robots.txt` directives. Any web scraping or crawling operation should aim for the same level of compliance. It's standard practice for bots to check `robots.txt` before crawling begins.

Your scraping process should mirror this. Website administrators usually disallow access to certain areas for valid reasons, such as reducing server strain or preventing crawlers from getting trapped in infinite loops (e.g., calendar pages).

Since your custom scraper's user agent probably isn't explicitly named in `robots.txt` files (unlike `Googlebot` or `Bingbot`), you primarily need to focus on rules applied to the wildcard user agent (*). You can parse the downloaded file to identify these restrictions. Here’s a conceptual Python example:

import requests
import re
from urllib.parse import urlparse

# Assume robots_content holds the text from a downloaded robots.txt file
# robots_content = """
# User-agent: *
# Disallow: /admin/
# Disallow: /private_stuff/
# Disallow: /*?sessionid=*
#
# User-agent: Googlebot
# Allow: /private_stuff/allowed-for-google.html
# """

def get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, user_agent='*'):
    disallowed = []
    current_ua = None
    lines = robots_content.splitlines()

    for line in lines:
        line = line.strip()
        if not line or line.startswith('#'):
            continue

        parts = line.split(':', 1)
        if len(parts) != 2:
            continue

        directive = parts[0].strip().lower()
        value = parts[1].strip()

        if directive == 'user-agent':
            current_ua = value
        elif directive == 'disallow' and current_ua == user_agent:
            if value: # Ensure Disallow value is not empty
                disallowed.append(value)

    return disallowed

# Example Usage:
# disallowed_for_all = get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, '*')
# print(f"Disallowed paths for '*': {disallowed_for_all}")

def can_fetch(url_path, disallowed_paths):
    # Ensure url_path starts with /
    if not url_path.startswith('/'):
        url_path = '/' + url_path

    for path_pattern in disallowed_paths:
        # Simple pattern matching: '*' wildcard, '$' end anchor
        regex_pattern = re.escape(path_pattern)
        regex_pattern = regex_pattern.replace(r'\*', '.*')
        if regex_pattern.endswith(r'\$'):
            regex_pattern = regex_pattern[:-2] + '$'
        else:
            # Ensure partial matches on directories work (e.g., /private/ matches /private/page.html)
            if not regex_pattern.endswith('$'):
                 regex_pattern += '.*' # Match anything following if it's a directory/prefix
        # Ensure the pattern matches from the start of the path
        if re.match('^' + regex_pattern, url_path):
            return False # Found a matching disallow rule

    return True # No disallow rule matched

# Example Check:
# url_to_check = "/private_stuff/some_page.html"
# is_allowed = can_fetch(urlparse(url_to_check).path, disallowed_for_all)
# print(f"Can fetch {url_to_check}? {is_allowed}") # Should be False based on example content

This refined script extracts disallowed paths for the wildcard user agent and provides a function to check if a given URL path is permissible according to those rules.

While respecting `robots.txt` is crucial, it's also vital to manage your crawl rate responsibly, especially during a website's peak traffic times. Scrapers can send far more requests than human users, potentially degrading site performance for everyone. Using high-quality, ethically sourced proxies, like those offered by Evomi, can help manage your scraper's identity, but responsible behavior remains key.

Consider implementing delays between requests or monitoring server response times. If response times increase significantly, slow down your scraper to avoid overburdening the target server. While website owners generally welcome search engine crawlers, they might be less tolerant of aggressive scraping.

Concluding Thoughts

Whether operating a search engine crawler or a web scraper, adhering to `robots.txt` directives is a fundamental aspect of responsible web automation. Search engines do this by default; your scraping projects should too.

Fortunately, accessing and interpreting these files is relatively straightforward. For most custom scrapers, focusing on the wildcard (*) rules is sufficient. By incorporating `robots.txt` checks and practicing considerate crawling habits (like rate limiting), you can gather the data you need while respecting website resources and guidelines.

Understanding Robots.txt: A Guide for Web Scrapers Using Proxies

Ever stumbled upon a `robots.txt` file? It's a simple text document found on most websites. You can usually view it by appending `/robots.txt` to a site's main URL (like http://yourwebsite.com/robots.txt).

Despite its simplicity, `robots.txt` plays a crucial role in the world of automated web interactions, including crawling and scraping. Originally designed for search engine bots, its guidelines now extend to virtually all forms of web automation.

What Exactly is Robots.txt?

At its core, the `robots.txt` file contains instructions for bots and automated scripts visiting a website. Typically, it specifies which sections of the site bots should avoid accessing. It often includes a `User-agent` identifier, indicating which specific bots (like search engine crawlers) the rules apply to.

The file follows specific formatting conventions. For instance, to block all bots from accessing a directory named `/confidential/`, the file might look like this:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

However, website owners can create more nuanced rules. They might allow a specific bot access while restricting others:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
# Allow access only to this page within the restricted directory
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

In this scenario, all bots except `SpecificBot` are barred from the `/confidential/` directory, but `SpecificBot` is permitted to visit `/confidential/public-info.html`.

It's vital to remember that `robots.txt` is a directive, not a security measure. Bots *can* technically ignore these instructions and access any publicly available page. However, disregarding `robots.txt` is widely considered bad practice, and reputable organizations generally adhere to its rules.

Furthermore, even if a section is disallowed, bots might inadvertently land there if an internal link points to it from an allowed page. Crawlers often follow links they discover.

Consequently, `robots.txt` serves both web crawlers and Search Engine Optimization (SEO). It guides crawlers on permissible paths and tells search engines which pages should (or shouldn't) be indexed for search results.

The Anatomy of a Robots.txt File

As noted, `robots.txt` relies on a specific syntax for clarity and effectiveness. The key components include:

  • User-agent Directive: Specifies the bot(s) to which the subsequent rules apply.

  • Allow/Disallow Rules: Defines access permissions for specific directories or pages for the designated user agent.

  • Special Characters: While not full regex support, `robots.txt` uses characters like the asterisk (*) as a wildcard (matching any character sequence) and the dollar sign ($) to denote the end of a URL path.

Let's revisit a previous example structure:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

User-agent lines always initiate a rule block. In the first block, the wildcard * means the `Disallow: /confidential/` rule applies to *all* user agents. The second block creates an exception specifically for `SpecificBot`.

Disallowing certain areas helps manage how search engines crawl a site. Most search engines allocate a "crawl budget"—a limit on how many URLs they will crawl on a site during a visit. Blocking unimportant or redundant sections ensures the crawler focuses its budget on valuable content, which is crucial for SEO on large websites.

The dollar sign ($) offers finer control, often used to target specific file types or URL patterns. While less common, it can be very useful:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*.pdf$

This rule instructs all bots not to crawl any URL ending specifically with `.pdf`. Another practical use is preventing the crawling of URLs with tracking parameters, which can lead to duplicate content issues:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*?ref=

Here, any URL containing the query parameter `ref=` (often used for referral tracking) is disallowed for all bots.

How to Interpret a Robots.txt File: A Quick Guide

On nearly every domain, the `robots.txt` file resides in the main directory and is accessible by adding `/robots.txt` to the base URL (e.g., http://example.com/robots.txt).

Since it's plain text, fetching its contents programmatically is straightforward. Using Python with the `requests` library is a popular method:

import requests

target_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

try:
    response = requests.get(target_url)
    response.raise_for_status() # Check if the request was successful
    print(response.text)
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Error fetching robots.txt: {e}")

This code snippet prints the content of the `robots.txt` file. For web scraping projects involving multiple sites, you'll likely want to fetch and store these files locally for efficient checking:

import requests
import os

# URL for the robots.txt file
robots_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

# Define filename based on domain or other convention
file_name = "example_com_robots.txt"

try:
    # Fetch the content
    response = requests.get(robots_url)
    response.raise_for_status()  # Ensure request was successful

    # Save the content locally
    with open(file_name, "w", encoding='utf-8') as f:
        f.write(response.text)

    print(f"{file_name} downloaded successfully.")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Failed to download {robots_url}: {e}")

This saves the file, allowing offline access. Adopting a consistent naming convention is advisable when dealing with numerous `robots.txt` files.

For website owners, tools like Google Search Console offer a validator (Robots.txt Tester) to check if your file is correctly structured and interpreted by Google.

Ethical Web Scraping: Working with Robots.txt

Major search engines rigorously follow `robots.txt` directives. Any web scraping or crawling operation should aim for the same level of compliance. It's standard practice for bots to check `robots.txt` before crawling begins.

Your scraping process should mirror this. Website administrators usually disallow access to certain areas for valid reasons, such as reducing server strain or preventing crawlers from getting trapped in infinite loops (e.g., calendar pages).

Since your custom scraper's user agent probably isn't explicitly named in `robots.txt` files (unlike `Googlebot` or `Bingbot`), you primarily need to focus on rules applied to the wildcard user agent (*). You can parse the downloaded file to identify these restrictions. Here’s a conceptual Python example:

import requests
import re
from urllib.parse import urlparse

# Assume robots_content holds the text from a downloaded robots.txt file
# robots_content = """
# User-agent: *
# Disallow: /admin/
# Disallow: /private_stuff/
# Disallow: /*?sessionid=*
#
# User-agent: Googlebot
# Allow: /private_stuff/allowed-for-google.html
# """

def get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, user_agent='*'):
    disallowed = []
    current_ua = None
    lines = robots_content.splitlines()

    for line in lines:
        line = line.strip()
        if not line or line.startswith('#'):
            continue

        parts = line.split(':', 1)
        if len(parts) != 2:
            continue

        directive = parts[0].strip().lower()
        value = parts[1].strip()

        if directive == 'user-agent':
            current_ua = value
        elif directive == 'disallow' and current_ua == user_agent:
            if value: # Ensure Disallow value is not empty
                disallowed.append(value)

    return disallowed

# Example Usage:
# disallowed_for_all = get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, '*')
# print(f"Disallowed paths for '*': {disallowed_for_all}")

def can_fetch(url_path, disallowed_paths):
    # Ensure url_path starts with /
    if not url_path.startswith('/'):
        url_path = '/' + url_path

    for path_pattern in disallowed_paths:
        # Simple pattern matching: '*' wildcard, '$' end anchor
        regex_pattern = re.escape(path_pattern)
        regex_pattern = regex_pattern.replace(r'\*', '.*')
        if regex_pattern.endswith(r'\$'):
            regex_pattern = regex_pattern[:-2] + '$'
        else:
            # Ensure partial matches on directories work (e.g., /private/ matches /private/page.html)
            if not regex_pattern.endswith('$'):
                 regex_pattern += '.*' # Match anything following if it's a directory/prefix
        # Ensure the pattern matches from the start of the path
        if re.match('^' + regex_pattern, url_path):
            return False # Found a matching disallow rule

    return True # No disallow rule matched

# Example Check:
# url_to_check = "/private_stuff/some_page.html"
# is_allowed = can_fetch(urlparse(url_to_check).path, disallowed_for_all)
# print(f"Can fetch {url_to_check}? {is_allowed}") # Should be False based on example content

This refined script extracts disallowed paths for the wildcard user agent and provides a function to check if a given URL path is permissible according to those rules.

While respecting `robots.txt` is crucial, it's also vital to manage your crawl rate responsibly, especially during a website's peak traffic times. Scrapers can send far more requests than human users, potentially degrading site performance for everyone. Using high-quality, ethically sourced proxies, like those offered by Evomi, can help manage your scraper's identity, but responsible behavior remains key.

Consider implementing delays between requests or monitoring server response times. If response times increase significantly, slow down your scraper to avoid overburdening the target server. While website owners generally welcome search engine crawlers, they might be less tolerant of aggressive scraping.

Concluding Thoughts

Whether operating a search engine crawler or a web scraper, adhering to `robots.txt` directives is a fundamental aspect of responsible web automation. Search engines do this by default; your scraping projects should too.

Fortunately, accessing and interpreting these files is relatively straightforward. For most custom scrapers, focusing on the wildcard (*) rules is sufficient. By incorporating `robots.txt` checks and practicing considerate crawling habits (like rate limiting), you can gather the data you need while respecting website resources and guidelines.

Understanding Robots.txt: A Guide for Web Scrapers Using Proxies

Ever stumbled upon a `robots.txt` file? It's a simple text document found on most websites. You can usually view it by appending `/robots.txt` to a site's main URL (like http://yourwebsite.com/robots.txt).

Despite its simplicity, `robots.txt` plays a crucial role in the world of automated web interactions, including crawling and scraping. Originally designed for search engine bots, its guidelines now extend to virtually all forms of web automation.

What Exactly is Robots.txt?

At its core, the `robots.txt` file contains instructions for bots and automated scripts visiting a website. Typically, it specifies which sections of the site bots should avoid accessing. It often includes a `User-agent` identifier, indicating which specific bots (like search engine crawlers) the rules apply to.

The file follows specific formatting conventions. For instance, to block all bots from accessing a directory named `/confidential/`, the file might look like this:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

However, website owners can create more nuanced rules. They might allow a specific bot access while restricting others:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
# Allow access only to this page within the restricted directory
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

In this scenario, all bots except `SpecificBot` are barred from the `/confidential/` directory, but `SpecificBot` is permitted to visit `/confidential/public-info.html`.

It's vital to remember that `robots.txt` is a directive, not a security measure. Bots *can* technically ignore these instructions and access any publicly available page. However, disregarding `robots.txt` is widely considered bad practice, and reputable organizations generally adhere to its rules.

Furthermore, even if a section is disallowed, bots might inadvertently land there if an internal link points to it from an allowed page. Crawlers often follow links they discover.

Consequently, `robots.txt` serves both web crawlers and Search Engine Optimization (SEO). It guides crawlers on permissible paths and tells search engines which pages should (or shouldn't) be indexed for search results.

The Anatomy of a Robots.txt File

As noted, `robots.txt` relies on a specific syntax for clarity and effectiveness. The key components include:

  • User-agent Directive: Specifies the bot(s) to which the subsequent rules apply.

  • Allow/Disallow Rules: Defines access permissions for specific directories or pages for the designated user agent.

  • Special Characters: While not full regex support, `robots.txt` uses characters like the asterisk (*) as a wildcard (matching any character sequence) and the dollar sign ($) to denote the end of a URL path.

Let's revisit a previous example structure:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /confidential/

User-agent: SpecificBot
Allow: /confidential/public-info.html

User-agent lines always initiate a rule block. In the first block, the wildcard * means the `Disallow: /confidential/` rule applies to *all* user agents. The second block creates an exception specifically for `SpecificBot`.

Disallowing certain areas helps manage how search engines crawl a site. Most search engines allocate a "crawl budget"—a limit on how many URLs they will crawl on a site during a visit. Blocking unimportant or redundant sections ensures the crawler focuses its budget on valuable content, which is crucial for SEO on large websites.

The dollar sign ($) offers finer control, often used to target specific file types or URL patterns. While less common, it can be very useful:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*.pdf$

This rule instructs all bots not to crawl any URL ending specifically with `.pdf`. Another practical use is preventing the crawling of URLs with tracking parameters, which can lead to duplicate content issues:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /*?ref=

Here, any URL containing the query parameter `ref=` (often used for referral tracking) is disallowed for all bots.

How to Interpret a Robots.txt File: A Quick Guide

On nearly every domain, the `robots.txt` file resides in the main directory and is accessible by adding `/robots.txt` to the base URL (e.g., http://example.com/robots.txt).

Since it's plain text, fetching its contents programmatically is straightforward. Using Python with the `requests` library is a popular method:

import requests

target_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

try:
    response = requests.get(target_url)
    response.raise_for_status() # Check if the request was successful
    print(response.text)
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Error fetching robots.txt: {e}")

This code snippet prints the content of the `robots.txt` file. For web scraping projects involving multiple sites, you'll likely want to fetch and store these files locally for efficient checking:

import requests
import os

# URL for the robots.txt file
robots_url = "http://example.com/robots.txt"

# Define filename based on domain or other convention
file_name = "example_com_robots.txt"

try:
    # Fetch the content
    response = requests.get(robots_url)
    response.raise_for_status()  # Ensure request was successful

    # Save the content locally
    with open(file_name, "w", encoding='utf-8') as f:
        f.write(response.text)

    print(f"{file_name} downloaded successfully.")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    print(f"Failed to download {robots_url}: {e}")

This saves the file, allowing offline access. Adopting a consistent naming convention is advisable when dealing with numerous `robots.txt` files.

For website owners, tools like Google Search Console offer a validator (Robots.txt Tester) to check if your file is correctly structured and interpreted by Google.

Ethical Web Scraping: Working with Robots.txt

Major search engines rigorously follow `robots.txt` directives. Any web scraping or crawling operation should aim for the same level of compliance. It's standard practice for bots to check `robots.txt` before crawling begins.

Your scraping process should mirror this. Website administrators usually disallow access to certain areas for valid reasons, such as reducing server strain or preventing crawlers from getting trapped in infinite loops (e.g., calendar pages).

Since your custom scraper's user agent probably isn't explicitly named in `robots.txt` files (unlike `Googlebot` or `Bingbot`), you primarily need to focus on rules applied to the wildcard user agent (*). You can parse the downloaded file to identify these restrictions. Here’s a conceptual Python example:

import requests
import re
from urllib.parse import urlparse

# Assume robots_content holds the text from a downloaded robots.txt file
# robots_content = """
# User-agent: *
# Disallow: /admin/
# Disallow: /private_stuff/
# Disallow: /*?sessionid=*
#
# User-agent: Googlebot
# Allow: /private_stuff/allowed-for-google.html
# """

def get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, user_agent='*'):
    disallowed = []
    current_ua = None
    lines = robots_content.splitlines()

    for line in lines:
        line = line.strip()
        if not line or line.startswith('#'):
            continue

        parts = line.split(':', 1)
        if len(parts) != 2:
            continue

        directive = parts[0].strip().lower()
        value = parts[1].strip()

        if directive == 'user-agent':
            current_ua = value
        elif directive == 'disallow' and current_ua == user_agent:
            if value: # Ensure Disallow value is not empty
                disallowed.append(value)

    return disallowed

# Example Usage:
# disallowed_for_all = get_disallowed_paths(robots_content, '*')
# print(f"Disallowed paths for '*': {disallowed_for_all}")

def can_fetch(url_path, disallowed_paths):
    # Ensure url_path starts with /
    if not url_path.startswith('/'):
        url_path = '/' + url_path

    for path_pattern in disallowed_paths:
        # Simple pattern matching: '*' wildcard, '$' end anchor
        regex_pattern = re.escape(path_pattern)
        regex_pattern = regex_pattern.replace(r'\*', '.*')
        if regex_pattern.endswith(r'\$'):
            regex_pattern = regex_pattern[:-2] + '$'
        else:
            # Ensure partial matches on directories work (e.g., /private/ matches /private/page.html)
            if not regex_pattern.endswith('$'):
                 regex_pattern += '.*' # Match anything following if it's a directory/prefix
        # Ensure the pattern matches from the start of the path
        if re.match('^' + regex_pattern, url_path):
            return False # Found a matching disallow rule

    return True # No disallow rule matched

# Example Check:
# url_to_check = "/private_stuff/some_page.html"
# is_allowed = can_fetch(urlparse(url_to_check).path, disallowed_for_all)
# print(f"Can fetch {url_to_check}? {is_allowed}") # Should be False based on example content

This refined script extracts disallowed paths for the wildcard user agent and provides a function to check if a given URL path is permissible according to those rules.

While respecting `robots.txt` is crucial, it's also vital to manage your crawl rate responsibly, especially during a website's peak traffic times. Scrapers can send far more requests than human users, potentially degrading site performance for everyone. Using high-quality, ethically sourced proxies, like those offered by Evomi, can help manage your scraper's identity, but responsible behavior remains key.

Consider implementing delays between requests or monitoring server response times. If response times increase significantly, slow down your scraper to avoid overburdening the target server. While website owners generally welcome search engine crawlers, they might be less tolerant of aggressive scraping.

Concluding Thoughts

Whether operating a search engine crawler or a web scraper, adhering to `robots.txt` directives is a fundamental aspect of responsible web automation. Search engines do this by default; your scraping projects should too.

Fortunately, accessing and interpreting these files is relatively straightforward. For most custom scrapers, focusing on the wildcard (*) rules is sufficient. By incorporating `robots.txt` checks and practicing considerate crawling habits (like rate limiting), you can gather the data you need while respecting website resources and guidelines.

Author

Nathan Reynolds

Web Scraping & Automation Specialist

About Author

Nathan specializes in web scraping techniques, automation tools, and data-driven decision-making. He helps businesses extract valuable insights from the web using ethical and efficient scraping methods powered by advanced proxies. His expertise covers overcoming anti-bot mechanisms, optimizing proxy rotation, and ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations.

Like this article? Share it.
You asked, we answer - Users questions:
Does using different proxy IP addresses affect how I should interpret robots.txt rules?+
What are the potential legal risks if my web scraper ignores robots.txt directives, even when using proxies?+
How frequently should my web scraper check for changes in a target website's robots.txt file?+
Can the `Sitemap:` directive sometimes found in robots.txt be useful for web scraping?+
Does the robots.txt file ever provide guidance on crawl speed or request delays?+

In This Article